It has been a slow year
for blogging, primarily due to the workload of balancing my pastoral role with
another passion – leading and teaching a new Year 11 Science course. I have
been able to explore and inquire as to the motivation and purpose of learning
for my students, comparing and contrasting the students in this course with
those in my senior Chemistry classes. Honestly, I have probably ended up with
more questions than answers, but I have found one way to offer a course within
a traditional school system which has the learning and the student at the
centre, with NCEA credits being conveniently earned along the way.
Year 11 Practical Science
At the end of last year,
I approached my Head of Department about redesigning our “Alternative Science”
course. This was already a completely internally-assessed course, designed for
students who struggled to achieve success in exam-format assessments. It was a
meaningful and valuable course already; I just thought that it could be a
little more student-centred and could offer more student agency.
The development and implementation of this course has
been a real eye-opener for me, and highly rewarding for me, the teacher of the
other class, and for most of the students who were given the opportunity to
enrol in this course. I have been forced to become more fluent in a range of
Level 1 Achievement Standards, and not just those in Science. I have learned a
lot about the “credit-shopping” focus of students, regardless of their
perceived ability and/or motivation. I have finally developed a way to support
and guide less-organised students through portfolio-style assessments – it
isn’t perfect, but it is a huge improvement on where we were at the start of
the year!
If you are interested, you can read more about the
journey in these posts:
We have designed a course which starts off with a
Chemistry unit (because everyone loves mixing and burning chemicals) to teach
observation and experimental skills. This is followed by a unit based around a
Conspiracy Theory to teach about Scientific Literacy and research skills. The
final prescribed unit is a Physics practical investigation to develop students’
Fair Testing. For these parts of the course, we kept a Class Blog to record the
important content and skills:
The remainder of the
year is focused on students’ interests and finding ways to structure these
interests into robust inquiries. We had inquiries based on shotguns, MotoX,
artillery, rugby kicking techniques, rowing technique, skateboarding tricks…it
was amazing!
The teachers’ role is that of a mentor and (supportive)
critic, while also being charged with finding suitable NCEA Achievement
Standards to assess the learning with. As part of this, the marking schedules
and portfolio coversheets have been co-constructed with the students. This has
given transparency to the assessment and the expectations upon the students. This
has also been the really time-consuming part, but also very rewarding!
The purpose of learning in this course has been,
ultimately, to explore an inherent or developed interest and investigate it in
a scientific manner. The wonderful outcomes have included most student earning
at least 16 NCEA Level 1 credits along the way (some at Excellence level),
outstanding student engagement, and a dramatic increase in students’
self-belief and self-worth.
“Academic” Courses
This year, I also had my philosophies regarding
assessment challenged. While teaching the Year 11 course, I have also been
teaching Level 2 and Level 3 Chemistry. These are courses where grades are
ever-important. Most of these students are expecting to be shown how to excel
in assessment tasks, sometimes regardless of the quality of the actual
learning.
It would indeed be great to offer the same level of student agency
and flexibility in these courses. However, the assessments do have the power to
drive the learning in these classes. The day-to-day teaching and learning
opportunities can be such that student choice and differentiated learning can
be provided but, ultimately, there are externally-assessed examinations to
prepare for.
There is no way to avoid the amount and specificity of
the content that must be “covered” for these assessments. There is no escaping
that students need to be coached how to answer examination-style questions at
some stage through each unit. There is no avoiding the issue that to offer a
meaningful number of credits, there is a LOT of work to get through.
If tertiary institutions put the main onus upon the
externally-assessed Achievement Standards, courses such as Chemistry will
always be driven by the assessment, rather than the learning. As I say, my
philosophies have been challenged. By offering such an exciting course to the
Year 11 “strugglers”, I have felt as though my senior chemists have missed out
on the opportunity to explore the magic of their subject due the focus on
grades. This is not a criticism, merely an observation…tinged with a little
frustration, as I do not have the answer.
Why Are We Learning This?
Through two very different types of courses, I come back
to that old adage from the disenchanted student, “Why are we learning this
stuff? When will I ever need it in my life?” If you do not view these as fair
questions, then I suggest you care more about your subject than you do about
your students.
Student agency regarding contexts and, dare I suggest it,
means of assessment are key components of making the learning meaningful to
students. Surely this is achievable in Year 9 and 10, even in the silo of a
single subject. Not to be disparaging, but context is even possible in
Mathematics. NCEA is using contextualised questions more and more. What better
preparation can there be than to apply mathematical skills to real student
interests? I know that subjects like English, Social Studies and Science lend
themselves more towards this type of learning, but Science is often prone to
being too abstract if taken out of context and focused more on content.
If it is manageable in Years 9 and 10, why not beyond
this? This is where the students’ respective reasons for learning become vital.
Does the student sees learning in school as part of the journey to tertiary
study? Does the student see learning in school as a way to learn how to learn,
but has no (current) aspirations for further study? Does the student just want
to be entertained until he/she finds a job that is interesting enough to do
instead of being at school?
If the student sees tertiary study as the ultimate goal,
then getting the grades to achieve this goal makes the learning authentic in
itself. Courses that optimise this student’s ability to reach this goal are
suitable. At the same time, these courses need to develop the whole student, of
course, but the purpose of the learning is further study; the course must cater
for this for this student.
If the student does not see tertiary study as the goal,
then grades themselves (beyond getting sufficient credits to earn their NCEA
Level 1 certificate, for example) are not going to be motivation enough.
Authentic learning opportunities are vital for this student. Can the learning
be applied to a hobby, interest, potential career…? This student’s course must
provide enough flexibility and agency for this student to persevere with the
learning, and to see the value of learning.
As I said at the start, I think I have more questions
than answers. Do we need to offer two (or more) pathways for students in our
courses beyond Year 10, in every school? How do we make them synergetic enough
that students can shift course if they find their goals and aspirations have
changed along the way? Regardless of the answers that are correct for your
students, your school, and your community, when looking at your courses please
always ask yourself what the purpose of the learning is.
